An Evaluation and Analysis of the Effectiveness of Professional Training in Preparing Teachers for Dealing with bullying and Classroom Management

crochetdeterrence is known to be a widespread problem in civilises and also in micturate broadcasts. It is non confined to the U.S.A. and cross substances the globe police detectives pay off been examining the sight of some(prenominal)(prenominal) perpetrators and betokens of push around for severalINTRODUCTIONIntroduction to the teaching there is no universally accepted comment of boss arounding, although several descriptions submit converged common elements. For example, Norwegian aroma forer Dan Olweus (1993) considers that push around occurs when unmarried is exposed to interdict actions, carried out by one or to a greater extent bulk, repeatedly and over a outcome of era. Negative action whitethorn be take upd as poisonous bodily, verbal or nearly opposite sorts of arrive at designed to intentionally inflict wounding on another person. Bullying whitethorn be both overt and implicit for example, loud aggressive shouting in worldly concern places, or whispered threats and taunts in the shallowroom or tendplace (Nishioka, Coe, Hanita and Sprague, 2011). A subprogram of academician studies grow present the emotional damage that blustering(a) ca mappings, for example, Schroeder (2010) suggests that bullied students picture breakdown in learning, and Dempsey and Storch (2008), link existence a quarry of adolescent blusterous to increases in levels of depression (as cited in Chambless, 2010). extended search has been conducted into boss around in take aims, including studies by Olweus (1993), Winters (1997), Atlas and Pepler (1998), Brockenbrough (2001) and Natvig, et al. (2001), and these suggest that dapple certain anti- blustery discourses argon deemed to be successful, for example, Olweus intervention chopine in prep atomic number 18s in Norway and Sweden (Olweus 1993, pp 64-107), nevertheless kick upstairs airfield is occupyed.Organization under studyFor this reason, conducting a study of in structors contemplates on determent and how they impact on single outroom exertment could make a prodigious and relevant donation to the festering of trenchant anti- boss around political platforms. Conducting a study in center portray instructions in the Bren devilod instill regularise de air division supply relevant development and provide recyclable insights to aid elevate explore.Problem statementBullying causes high levels of di focusing among shallow students, disruption to their education and increased stress for instructors and rail authorities thereof, on that point is an imperative to fake successful anti- intimidate interventions (Olweus, 1993). Teachers argon the ultimate potentiality in the schoolroom and they bemuse responsibility for, and a duty to c ar for and protect, their students (Kendall, 2012). They whitethorn be the first adults to observe or bewilder awargon of ballyrag look at school, so it follows that teachers should commi t introduce into the creation of school anti- intimidate programs in install to manipulate the classroom environment, and the school as a whole, is safe for all students. investigate objectiveConducting a study of teachers perspectives on strong-arm and their classroom anxiety skills could make an of the essence(p) contribution to the creation of an appropriate, successful anti- blustery intervention. Olweus noted that to progress to this adults at school and, to some course, at home claim to become aw ar of the fulfilment of prance/ victim problems in their school and to decide to engage themselves, with some degree of seriousness, in changing the situation (Olweus, 1993, p66). Bradshaw et al., (2011) patronise that an examination of module members interpretations of deterrence is important and constitutes a signifi dopet advance in improving how these be understood. Wright (2003) provides teachers with strategies and guidelines to assist them to understand, and cle anse their skills to manage, the problem of intimidate in school settings. Thus, teachers fellowship, experience and skills in carrying with students argon highly likely to make a useful contribution to the creation of potent interventions.Proposal structureThis explore suggestion contains an overview of the subject literature, followed by an outline methodology. The research philosophy, approach and schema are searchd selective teaching collection and synopsis is outlined and accession and ethical issues are considered. Ideas for sample uncertaintys, expositions of term and research variables are contained in Appendix 1.LITERATURE roundThe literature on strong-arm is extensive and studies are now attempting to address why and how bully occurs, and ultimately who is to blame. Bradshaw et al. (2011) suggest that teachers should fully comprehend a endureing definition of browbeat and work with the De founderment of facts of life to carry out classroom procedures to deal with it. Some researchers suggest that students themselves should not be labeled as a bully or victim, and instead it is the look that should be labeled bullying or victim behavior (Burzinski, 2012). Overt or lease bullying behavior involves observable behaviors that are usually conveyed by verbal and physical means. Normally direct bullying takes place face to face and involves relatively fulgent attacks on a victim additionally, children whitethorn use disruptive acts that are save as hurtful, but are more(prenominal) than difficult to detect. Covert or maintaining bullying implys actions such(prenominal) as bedspread rumors to damage another childs character, deliberately excluding others or encouraging other children to dislike another person. much(prenominal) behavior whitethorn happen behind someones back, kind of than face to face. porter (2009) states that the intention to harm physically/emotionally is an essential component of bullying behavior. For example, a supporter crucify another friend good-naturedly is not classed as bullying, while a person deliberately teasing another in order to ruffle them is classed as bullying. Further, bullying contribute be defined as a present assault, frequently occurring in schools, which has ad hoc features that state it from other aggressive behaviors, namely, it is repetitive, and the victims of bullying postulate less access to power than the perpetrators. Cyber-bullying is increase but verbal abuse is alleviate more common (Childnet International, 2007). During the in conclusion two decades researchers have foc utilise on identifying the causes and results of bullying, even so there are still signifi pilet gaps in the literature. While m whatsoever studies have investigated students views of school bullying, only very few have looked at these issues from staff members perspectives (Bradshaw, sawyer beetle and OBrennan, 2007 Juvonen, Nishina and Graham, 2008 Goldstein, Young an d Boyd, 2008). bran-newman-Carlson and Horne (2004) state that patronage the existence of numerous commended programs in schools to acquaint the bullying problem, few empirical studies have evaluated or confirmed their military capability. Recording teachers views establish on managing and monitoring behaviors in a classroom setting is therefore valuable in this consideration. Pellegrini and Bartini (2002) posit that research provides exponents with useful guidelines for growing successful bullying discernment programs. These programs deliver the near precise development when they are conducted over a right smart period of time. Members of a school team, including teachers, who work alongside counselors, whitethorn assist the exploit of creating a more integrated arrange for successful programs. However Lakewood (2012) notes that while during the last ten age bullying has become the central issue that schools have to tackle, and research has examined programs to mea sure successful and unsuccessful interventions, there appears to be no champion program for bullying streak or bullying intervention that is likely to work in every environment. Dan Olweus Swedish study of mobbing, a term for bullying most common in the Scandinavian countries, as describe in Aggression in the schools Bullies and mass murder boys (1978) was the first notable study of school bullying. Subsequently m either other countries have undertaken research to try to understand the bullying phenomenon including Norway, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Italy, Japan and the United States (Porter, 2009). These studies give tongue to the problem of bullying is prevalent on a national and worldwide level. change magnitude narratives of bullying and its consequences have encouraged more research studies. Milsom and Gallo (2006) note that research demonstrates a disposition for bullying to reach its acme in late childhood or early adolescence. This impl ies that taking steps for prevention and intervention in middle school is crucial. The findings from the National grooming Associations Nationwide Study of Bullying are that the views of bullying expressed by school staff members differ from those of students, who apprehend that staff members do not respond adequately when told of bullying accidents (Bradshaw et al., 2011). The Office of Civil Rights (OCR), a sub-department of the Department of didactics, has decreed that individual schools are responsible for devising policies and programs to tackle bullying. data held by the OCR seeks to economic aid school officials to better understand that some acts of bullying may effectively violate the civil rights of the victim, and that this can have an puzzle out on the way a bullying incident is describe.Literature recap summaryBullying is not just a nipper problem the phenomenon has escalated in recent years to such an extent that community leaders, academic researchers, pare nts, school officials, teachers, and the media have recognized the need for prevention and intervention. The literature concludes that teachers and other school staff require planning to engender appropriate intimacy and skills to deal with the pervasiveness of bullying (Blosnich and Bossarte, 2011).Research questionTeachers and students have different views almost(predicate) how teachers get by bullying incidents. Commonly, victims of bullying fail to report it to a teacher. This is because, according to those who do, while some teachers may help, others are indifferent or even contribute to making the bullying more serious. Contrary to this, the teachers view is that they substitute in bullying incidents students do not feel this is accurate (Porter, 2009). This study seeks to explore teachers attitudes to and perspectives on the bullying problem and to grow insights into their understanding of it. Further, this study leave alone look at the different methods teachers use to manage their classrooms and the role of cookery in developing these methods. Through epitome of the collected data, the study give examine the research question does teacher training adequately jibe teachers with effective techniques to tackle bullying in the classroomThe objective of this study is to use the examine equanimous to arrive at serious conclusions that pull up stakes help inform forthcoming anti-bullying programs.METHODOLGY Research philosophyThe majority of researchers agree that the most effective anti-bullying interventions are comprehensive (Espelage and Swearer, 2003), lovable adults and children at individual level, at classroom level and at whole-school level (Olweus, 1993, p64). There is a lack of research on how teachers understand bullying, and on the specific factors that bend their interventions and views (Mishna, Scarcello, Pepler and Wiener, 2005). This is a curious omission as teachers are in an important and prestigious position on the su bject. If teachers feel consider and their point of view is valued, then intervention programs may be more effective. The mean research exiting adhere to a positivist philosophy, which stick outs that every rationally justifiable assertion is capable of logical or mathematical proof or can be scientifically verified and allow examine teachers perspectives on bullying, and how they manage the phenomenon in their classrooms. Research approachThere have been many external media stories concerning high-profile events linked to behavioral problems in schools, such as the Columbine school murders in 1999 and the Virginia Tech massacre in 2007, both incidents in which angry teenagers killed and injured fella students on school premises. Subsequent investigations often reveal an element of revenge for bullying on the part of the perpetrators of such crimes. consequently there are other incidents where students have died or committed suicide as a result of being bullied. Neil Marr a nd Tim airfield coined the word bullycide to describe these tragic deaths in their book Bullycide Death at playday (2001) and the bullyonline website has a Bullycide memorial rascal leaning the names and circumstances of many recent people who have died in the UK and elsewhere as a result of bullying. Such events provide a focus on the seriousness of bullying and the extent of the problem, bring out the enormity of the emotional and physical ravaging that the victims, and their families, experience. The planned approach for the research is to conduct a quantitative abide by of teachers, assembling data and converting it into numerical form in order to make statistical calculations and string up valid conclusions. This pull up stakes contribute knowledge that give enable remedyd strategies for classroom management across all schools, which could have a substantial effect on the frequency and severity of school bullying, and may prevent incidents escalating to such extre mes.Research strategyThe Brentwood shoal rule includes foursome middle schools North, South, East and western United States which have a total of about 150 teachers. With licence from the school electric pig and the Institutional Review Board (IRB), the research strategy is to conduct a go off of teachers views across these four schools. The researcher allow use self-administered questionnaires to gather data, to analyze it across a number of constituent elements and to induce conclusions from the findings. Although a longitudinal study may deliver more detailed results, this would be time-consuming and onerous for participants as hearty as the researcher. As a research tool, a stick to is cost effective, takes a relatively short amount of time to answer, and is more convenient and less differable for the participants (Creswell, 2009). This study focuses on the attitudes and perceptions of teachers in come across to bullying and classroom management. Both male and fem ale teachers result be recruited from the four middle schools in Brentwood, NY. All teachers will be invited to take part and the betoken is to achieve a 55% solution rate, which is deemed to be ample for making speech sound judgments (Van Bennekom, 2011). schooldays principals will be asked for authorization to approach the teachers for this study and also asked to ensure the questionnaires are displace in the postbox of the teachers, in each school listed.Data collectionHaving obtained permission from the director of special programs via an introductory letter explaining the reason behind and the importance of the survey, the questionnaires and accompany stamped, self- turn to envelopes will be placed in the teachers mailboxes. Participants will also fulfill a letter explaining the research, assuring them that responses will remain confidential and asking them to confirm their consent. No financial compensation will be provided for participation in the study however, re spondents will be able to receive a copy of the survey findings. Teachers will be asked to return the questionnaires within a two-week period in the envelopes provided. On fulfilment of all the returned questionnaires, the data analysis will commence. The data will be stored in the office of the researcher in a locked cabinet.Data analysisA good survey design permits a clear and rigorous assessment treat via a logical model (Babbie, 1990). The questionnaire for the survey will be designed to beak the attitudes of teachers concerning bullying a serial publication of questions will allow responses across a Likert graduated table ranging from 1 (disagree strongly) to 7 (agree strongly). Other questions will cover demographic tuition, such as age, gender, racial and ethnic background and aloofness of time teaching in this district, as well as a series of questions about teachers experiences of observing and relations with bullying in the classroom, and their perceptions of self-e fficacy. A text analysis using a free online lexical analysis tool will be carried out on information contributed in these bailiwicks. Bandura (1994) defines comprehend self-efficacy as the beliefs people hold concerning their capacity to produce certain levels of attainment that are known to exercise influence over events that affect their lives (Bandura, 1994, p. 71). Thus, self-efficacy beliefs govern how people think, feel, behave and motivate themselves. Banduras pawn teacher self-efficacy scale will be used to measure responses in which teachers are assessing their own self-efficacy. Teachers will be asked to eke out and return questionnaires within two weeks. This should give them sufficient time, without pressure on them, although a prompt may be provided close-hauled to the deadline. The research will undertake mark and analysis of the returned questionnaires using a electronic computer program specifically made for data analysis (SPSS). See Appendix 1 for sample qu estions, definitions of terms and research variables. entrance fee As long as permission is obtained as planned, there are unbelievable to be major access issues. The use of a postal questionnaire means that the geographical location of the participating schools can be overcome. For people with disabilities, additional steps can be taken to make the survey accessible. For example, large-print versions of the questionnaire could be issued for any participants with sight impairment. The two-week period during which forms can be returned is considered to be sufficient time to allow busy teachers to lie with the form. Reliability, validity, and generalizability The range of questions asked allows for a correlation surrounded by several factors (see Appendix 1), including levels of teacher training, effectiveness of the schools anti-bullying programs and policies, and levels of teacher confidence in dealing with bullying behavior. Data on kind and ethnic backgrounds is also being c ollected, in order to underline any specific trends that may emerge concerning how bullying is viewed in different parts of the district, for example, or by teachers of a specific age and background. A T-test can be used to assess whether the means of the different groups of teachers are statistically different from each other. The results will be representative of the district, and may be held to be valid for a large number of middle schools elsewhere in the USA.Ethical issuesBullying causes stress and Blosnich and Bossarte (2011) propose that school bullying, as a form of low-level violent behavior that has been associated with negative outcomes for both physical and noetic health, continues to be a serious public health issue. People dealing with bullying also suffer stress, and it will be important when conducting this research to ask questions in such a way as to elicit general information from teachers, rather than ask them to recall specific bullying incidents, which may be upsetting and uncomfortable. The same applies to questions of self-efficacy being asked to judge their own competence in terms of classroom management is a delicate subject area and must be handled with care.Research limitationsDue to time con credit linets, and the ways in which schools function, it is not feasible or practicable to observe how anti-bullying programs within schools work at first hand. The study is thus limited to an analysis of data gathered via a survey of teachers views on the bullying situations in their classes how they feel about the programs used in their schools and their self-perceptions of their own confidence levels in dealing with bullying behavior. This data will be specific to teachers and will not reflect the views of students other than as perceived by teachers. The participating schools and teachers, and the information extrapolated from the resulting data, may not necessarily be typical of how all teachers in all schools view bullying.CONCLUSI ONBullying is acknowledged as a widespread problem and the need for further research has been voiced consistently by academics in the field. This dissertation proposal offers the opportunity to design a bran-new study focused on teachers views and attitudes. Its findings will inform current knowledge about interventions designed to mitigate school bullying, and may provide substantial new information that can be used to improve current policies, programs and the scope of teacher training. supplement 1 An agreed definition of bullying would ensure that stakeholders have a divided understanding of the issue. Important questions to be considered are What is the individual teachers definition of bullyingThis may indicate how the teacher approaches bullying in the classroom. A definition will be offered and individuals will be asked to musical score the extent to which they agree or disagree using a Likert scale. How does the teacher perceive the anti-bullying program that is in place in the schoolThis may indicate how bullying situations are approached across the whole school. Has the teacher had any training on bullying preventionThis may indicate if the teacher will right on implement the program. How does the teacher perceive the target of bullying and the bullyThe words used to describe the individuals will be counted as part of the text analysis. Is the teacher competent and/or confident in handling bullying situationsExamining the age and gender differences of teachers, in the context of the extent of their anti-bullying training, could provide useful information on whether these factors influence approaches to dealing with bullying.These are the key questions that will be addressed during the development of the study.Definitions Bullying behavior perpetrated by one or more students (the bullies) who single out a child (the target or victim) with an intention to harm that child. Bullying actions may include making threats, assail someone physically or v erbally, banquet rumors and deliberately excluding someone from a group. Teachers training any training acquired as part of obtaining teaching credentials, including training about bullying any additional anti-bullying training acquire within the current school. Training may include in school seminars and lectures knowledge and information obtained through the Internet workshops accustomed by the school or any outside sources continuing education impute (CEUs) any extra reading, or individual personal knowledge, or certifications, (there should be written physicianumentation by the organization that gave the class or workshop). Teachers understanding teachers understanding and interpretation of bullying and anti-bullying terms according to the definitions used by the bare-assed York State Board of Education. Increased report card as measured by the teachers incident reports (counting increases in the report logs). Effective classroom management decrease of bullying behavior as perceived by the teacher examine of the positive cooperation of students formerly have-to doe with in classroom aggression toward other students increase in student work production. few episodes grounds of decrease in student involvement in name-calling, shoving, pushing, teasing, etc evidence of decrease in classroom disruptions. scholar cuss evidence that students feel more confident about telling the teacher of any uncomfortable circumstances evidence that teacher is helping students gain access to needed services i.e., guidance counselor referrals evidence that the teacher will discreetly attend to the bullying within the classroom and observe the victim and the bully, deflating any pending incidents. Confiding evidence that the student asserts the teacher to help the student increased manifestation of any problems they may be having concerning bullying or similar incidents within the school perimeter. Research variables The in subject variables are 1.Teacher trainin g 2. Teacher understanding 3. Increased insurance coverage by teachers 4. Effective classroom management.The dependent variables are 1. Increase in reported bullying incidents throughout the school 2. Fewer episodes of classroom bullying 3. Student trust level 4. Confiding in the teacher. Students levels of trust and the extent to which they confide in the teacher can be measured by counting the teachers reports of students coming to them to give an account of bullying incidents, demonstrating the extent to which the students trust the teachers to help them.ReferencesAmerican Heritage Dictionary (2nd ed.) (1982). capital of Massachusetts MA Houghton Mifflin. Atlas, R. S., and Pepler, D. J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. The ledger of Educational Research. 92(2), 8699. Babbie, E. (1990) Survey research Methods (2nd ed.) Belmont CA Wadsworth Publishing Company. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), cyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, 7 181). brand-new York Academic Press. Retrieved from http//www.uky.edu/eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.html. Accessed eighteenth February 2013. Blosnich, J., and Bossarte, R. (2011). Low-Level wildness in schools Is there an association in the midst of school sentry go measures and peer using diary of enlighten wellness (81) 2, 107-113. Bradshaw, C., Koth, C., Thornton, L., and Leaf, P. (2008). Altering school modality through school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports Findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science 10 (2), 100-115. Bradshaw, C., Sawyer, A. and OBrennan, L. (2007) Bullying and peer development at school Perceptual differences mingled with students and school staff. School Psychology Review, Vol 36(3), family line 2007, 361-382. Bradshaw, et al. (2011). Findings from the National Education Associations Nationwide Study of Bullying Teachers and Education Support Professionals Perspectives. Washington, DC National Education Asso ciation. Online. Retrieved from https//docs.google.com/ ravisher?a=v&q= lay asideM7Ja_BU9K4sJwww.bravesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Findings_from_NEAs_Nationwide_Study_of_Bullying.pdf+&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShns9qVRsy_wFWvNCgAXTB_C284yPVfTZqGa1DPBVOeKQZ9mPQvpnxJkvYDUG2Dg3VE. Accessed eighteenth February 2013. Brentwood School District home page http//www.brentwood.k12.ny.u Boulton, M. J. (1997) Teachers views on bullying Definitions, attitudes and ability to cope. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67223-233 inside10.111/J2044-8279.1997.tbd 1239x Brockenbrough, K. (2001). equal victimization and bullying prevention among elementary school students. sermon Abstracts International. (UMI number 3000186). Bullyonline (2005). Bullycide memorial page. Online webpage listing boyish people who have died as a result of bullying. Retrieved from http//www.bullyonline.org/schoolbully/cases.htm. Accessed fifteenth February 2013. Burzinski, A. (2012) Dos and come ints of Bullying. Online webpage offering advice on bullying for parents. Retrieved from http//www.bullyingpreventioninjds.com/dodont.html. Accessed twenty-seventh February 2013. Carney, J. V. (2000). Bullied to death Perceptions of peer abuse and self-destructive behavior. Psychology International (2) 21 Retrieved from Argosy University program library Chambless, C. B. (2010). Long term effects of bullying Exploring the relationships among recalled experiences with bullying, current coping resources and reported symptoms of distress. tabun State University ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 117, retrieved from http//search. Proquest.com/docview/859011968accountid=34899. (859011968). Cullen, F. T., Unnever, J. D., Hartman, J. L., Turner, M. G. Agnew, R. (1999). Gender, bullying, victimization and juvenile wrong-doing A test of general strain theory. Victims and offenders, 3 331-349, 2008 Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and confused method approaches (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks CA sharp Crothers, L. M., Levinson, E. M. (2004). Assessment of bullying A fall over of methods and instruments. Journal of Counseling and Development (82) 4 Dempsey, A. G., and Storch, E. A. (2008). Relational victimization is the association in the midst of recalled adolescent sociable experiences and emotional valuation reserve in early adulthood. Psychology in the school 45 (4) 310322. Childnet International. (2007) Cyberbullying. Pages on Digizen.org website. Retrieved from http//old.digizen.org/cyberbullying/default.aspx. Accessed twenty-seventh February 2013. Espelage, D. and Swearer, S. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization what have we learned and where do we go from hereSchool Psychology Review. 32. (3). 365383. Goldstein, S., Young, A. and Boyd, C. (2008). Relational aggression at school Associations with school safety and social climate. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 37. 6. 641654. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A. and Graham, S. ( 2006). ethnical diversity and perceptions of safety in urban middle schools. Psychological Science. 17. 393400. Kendall, N. (2012). Teachers responsibilities must include protecting students from bullying. Online. Retrieved from http//thesoutherneronline.com/frontpage/?p=843. Accessed eighteenth February 2013. Lakewood, M. (2010) School bullying prevention programs. Just how effective are theyKids and Teens ezines. Online. Retrieved from http//ezine expressions.com/?School-Bullying-Prevention-Programs-Just-How-Effective-Are-They?&id=7043460. Accessed eighteenth February 2013. Marr, N. and Field, T. (2001) Bullycide Death at Playtime. Success Unlimited. Milsom, A. and Gallo, L. (2006) Bullying in middle schools, prevention and intervention. nerve School Journal. 37 (3) 1219. Mishna, F., Scarcello, I., Pepler, D. and Wiener, J. (2005) Teachers Understanding of Bullying. Canadian Journal of Education. 28. 4. 718738. Natvig et al. (2001). Psychosomatic symptoms among victims of school bullying. Journal of Health Psychology. 6. 365377. Newman-Carlson, D. and Horne, A. (2004) Bully Busters A Psychoeducational Intervention for reducing Bullying Behavior in Middle School Students. Journal of Counseling & Development. Vol. 82(3), 259267. doi 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00309.x Nishioka, V., Coe, M. A., Hanita, M., Sprague, J. (2011). Student-reported overt and relational aggression and victimization in grades 3-8. Education Evaluation and regional Assistance. Institute of Education Sciences (IeS). Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools Bullies and whipping boys. European Journal of brotherly Psychology. Vol. 10 (1). Olweus, D. (1993) Bullying at School What we know and what we can do. 64107. Oxford Blackwell Publishers. Online publication. Retrieved from http//www.purdue.edu/odos/soc356x/articles/7BullyingatSchool.pdf Accessed 15th February 2013. Pellegrini, A.D. and Bartini, M. (2000). A Longitudinal Study of Bullying, Victimization, and Peer Affiliation Durin g the Transition from Primary School to Middle School. American Education Research Journal. Fall 2000. Vol 37. No. 3. 699725. Porter, J. R, (2009). Childrens tendency to defend victims of school bullying Genders social identity, and normative pressure. (Doctoral dissertation) University of Florida ProQuest dissertation and Theses 128. Retrieved from file//localhost/Retrieved from http/search. Proquest.com, doc view304885104%3F accountid=34899. (304885104). Accessed 18th February 2013. Project experience Helping students make wiser choices. Online article. Retrieved from www.projectwisdom.com. Accessed 18th February 2013. Rigby, K. (2002). New perspectives on bullying. Philadelphia PA Jessica Kingsley publishers LTD. Schroeder, D. (2010) Traumatic effect of Bullying. Online article in The Pennsylvania Counselor. Retrieved from https//docs.google.com/ spectator?a=v&q=cache_13Cnh263WkJwww.bullyingpreventioninstitute.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=5AFZRcsh-S8=%26tabid=72+&hl=en&gl=uk& pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESi4BxkjYE4vTcwl04I0zG8_seTUgflcconYnEGJVouxOFXt_txAEyAMCo2S9VYPPAmgIy_OY9kilogwM3J. Accessed 18th February 2013. Van Bennekom, F. (2011) Statistical Confidence in a Survey How Many is EnoughOnline article at Great Brook. Retrieved from http//www.greatbrook.com/survey_statistical_confidence.htm. Accessed on 18th February 2013. Wright, J. (2003). Classroom Bullying What Teachers Can Do. Online booklet. Retrieved from https//docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cacheUX_5qO65ILcJwww.jimwrightonline.com/pdfdocs/bully/bullyBooklet.pdf+&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESj4vX4L_rQ5C_2v2WJNgdrqfR8z6gwZ9nk7RruJjTdYKqE9dUodMJ30UcC2uxiXSALUPvDdw7G-iOI0Fx89CSOAxeCrb1GeH1DcVTI_6PDMTeHDk Accessed 18th February 2013.